Reviewing Homework In High School Classes
Setting prep has no real price unless the teacher includes a regular review method. while not this review, students won't see prep as necessary as a result of they feel that the teacher doesn’t see it as necessary enough to review.
Homework is intended to consolidate learning that has occurred in school. What your review will is to more consolidate that learning through the recency/frequency side of learning.
Below is however I went regarding reviewing prep. First, there was my preparation.
I educated my students to put in writing down any queries that arose as they did their prep on the page wherever their prep was done, prepared for them to raise throughout ensuing period’s prep review.
Personally, i'd review the prep tasks beforehand, deciding what I required to stress or reteach (if necessary). i'd conjointly prepare answers in text kind if I deemed it a plus for my students.
Now, here is what I sometimes did at the beginning of ensuing lesson in reviewing prep.
• i'd check to check World Health Organization had done their prep. (If students had not done or been ready to do their prep, they were to check ME before the lesson to debate the issue).
• i'd browse at the remainder of the category perceptive visual communication that may recommend that others had not done their prep.
• If there have been signs, then i'd have all the scholars flip their books to the front thus I may check. (This stressed that i used to be serious regarding homework). i'd note these defaulters and sit down with them in their time.
• Next, i'd raise if there have been any queries from the prep. These i'd answer and any follow-up queries.
• i'd model my answers to the category, i.e. i'd try this verbally and on the board. i'd later offer a tough copy of my ‘model’ answer.
• Following this, i'd discuss the other problems I felt were necessary to fret regarding this subject, e.g. misconceptions, frequent student errors then on.
• Next, when setting the work to be done by the category for this lesson, i'd work with those students World Health Organization say ‘they don’t understand’. Here, i'd raise them wherever they ‘got lost’ and proceed, from that time, to reteach the subject to them to make the most effective understanding I may for these students.
• it's necessary to possess a follow-up for the defaulters. a primary step for them may be to try to to their prep throughout ensuing break and convey it to you at a nominal time. Consistent defaulters may incur additional serious consequences. I unbroken a diary record of all defaulters. This was helpful at parent teacher interviews and at reportage time.
• Lastly, I ne'er believed that students had no issues with their prep. i do know from expertise that areas would offer students issues. Therefore, i'd raise students queries in those areas as a review of the prep. i'd highlight the other small print before I went on with the teaching program.
Remember:
• The review of prep is as necessary because the students doing that prep and,
• prep could be a element within the method of learning study skills. that's necessary for future tutorial success.
0 comments:
Post a Comment